Does FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) cover OECD AI Principles?

63% of OECD AI Principles you already have

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) already covers about 63% of OECD AI Principles, leaving 3 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 2 Likely covered 3 New work 3

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) reaches these. This is the list to scope.

OECDAI-4

Accountability, Lifecycle Coverage, Documentation, and Record-Keeping

OECDAI-6

Human Oversight, Redress, and Contestation Mechanisms

OECDAI-7

Third-Party AI Audit, Impact Assessments, and Metrics for Trustworthy AI

Show the 5 you already have

OECDAI-3

Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection

OECDAI-5

Data Governance, Training Data Quality, Privacy, and Bias Mitigation

OECDAI-1

Inclusive Growth, Human-Centred Values, Fairness, and Sustainable Development

OECDAI-2

Transparency, Explainability, and Public-Facing Disclosure

OECDAI-8

AI Incident Reporting, Regulatory Compliance, Public Reporting, and International Cooperation

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair · Today's edition