Does FedRAMP Rev 5 cover PCI PIN Security?

40% of PCI PIN Security you already have

FedRAMP Rev 5 already covers about 40% of PCI PIN Security, leaving 26 of 43 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 17 New work 26

No control in FedRAMP Rev 5 maps directly to one in PCI PIN Security. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in FedRAMP Rev 5 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

CO-1

PINs Used for Cardholder Authentication Are Processed in Approved Devices

CO-10

Equipment Used to Process PINs and Keys Is Managed in a Secure Manner

CO-11

Secret and Private Keys and Key Components Are Generated, Conveyed, and Used in a Manner That Prevents or Detects Their Unauthorized Disclosure, Modification, or Substitution

CO-12

Keys Are Used in a Manner That Prevents or Detects Their Unauthorized Usage

CO-13

Keys Are Administered Throughout Their Lifecycle in a Secure Manner

CO-14

Materials Used to Generate or Transport Keys Are Treated With the Same Security as the Keys They Protect

CO-15

Cryptographic Keys Are Replaced With New Keys When Knowledge of Or Access to a Key Is No Longer Required

CO-16

Keys No Longer Used or Replaced Are Securely Destroyed

CO-17

Access to Secret and Private Cryptographic Keys and Key Material Is Restricted

CO-18

Logging Is in Place to Enable Audit and Investigation of Key Management Activities

CO-19

Organizations Implement and Document Risk-Mitigation Practices

CO-2

Devices Approved Under PCI PTS POI Have SRED Functionality

CO-3

POIs and HSMs Are Protected From Unauthorized Access

CO-4

Procedures Exist to Protect Devices From Tampering and Substitution

CO-5

Cryptographic Keys Are Generated Using Approved Methods

CO-6

Cryptographic Keys Are Conveyed or Transmitted Securely

CO-7

Key Loading Is Handled in a Secure Manner

CO-8

Keys Are Used Only for Their Designated Purpose

CO-9

Keys Are Administered in a Secure Manner

CO-Annex-A

Symmetric Key Distribution Using Asymmetric Techniques

CO-Annex-B

Key-Injection Facility Requirements

PCI-PIN-04

Security policy framework

PCI-PIN-17

Contractual security requirements

PCI-PIN-20

Exit strategy and transition planning

PCI-PIN-21

Incident detection and classification

PCI-PIN-22

Incident response and containment

Show the 17 you already have

PCI-PIN-05

Roles and responsibilities definition

PCI-PIN-06

Network security and segmentation

PCI-PIN-07

Endpoint protection and detection

PCI-PIN-08

Application security controls

PCI-PIN-09

Encryption and key management

PCI-PIN-10

Secure configuration standards

PCI-PIN-11

Business continuity planning and testing

PCI-PIN-12

Disaster recovery procedures

PCI-PIN-13

Third-party dependency management

PCI-PIN-14

Critical service identification

PCI-PIN-15

Communication and escalation procedures

PCI-PIN-16

Due diligence and onboarding

PCI-PIN-18

Ongoing monitoring and assessment

PCI-PIN-19

Concentration risk management

PCI-PIN-23

Regulatory reporting requirements

PCI-PIN-24

Customer notification procedures

PCI-PIN-25

Post-incident review and improvement

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in FedRAMP Rev 5 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair · Today's edition