50% of OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) you already have
CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) already covers about 50% of OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM), leaving
3 of 6 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 3
New work 3
No control in CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024)
maps directly to one in OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM). Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) reaches these. This is the list to scope.
DSOMM-2Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling
DSOMM-5Information Gathering, Logging, Monitoring, and Incident Response
DSOMM-6Metrics, Maturity Measurement, and Continuous Improvement
Show the 3 you already have
DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management
DSOMM-4Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses (2024) to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition