59% of Colombia Data Protection Law (Law 1581 of 2012) you already have
Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP already covers about 59% of Colombia Data Protection Law (Law 1581 of 2012), leaving
11 of 27 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 7
Likely covered 9
New work 11
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP reaches these. This is the list to scope.
CO-L1581-A12Duty to Inform the Data Subject (Privacy Notice)
CO-L1581-A14Consultations (Access Requests)
CO-L1581-A15Complaints (Reclamos)
CO-L1581-A17Duties of Controllers (Responsables)
CO-L1581-A18Duties of Processors (Encargados)
CO-L1581-A2Scope of Application
CO-L1581-A21Functions of the SIC
CO-L1581-A25National Database Registry (RNBD)
CO-L1581-A27Binding Corporate Rules
CO-L1581-A7Children's and Adolescents' Data
Show the 16 you already have
CO-L1581-A19Data Protection Authority (SIC)
CO-L1581-A26Prohibition on International Transfers
CO-L1581-A4-SEGURIDADPrinciple of Security
CO-L1581-A4-VERACIDADPrinciple of Veracity and Quality
CO-L1581-A6Processing of Sensitive Data
CO-L1581-A8Data Subject Rights (Habeas Data)
CO-L1581-A9Authorization of the Data Subject
CO-L1581-A10Cases Not Requiring Authorization
CO-L1581-A13Persons to Whom Information May Be Disclosed
CO-L1581-A4-ACCESOPrinciple of Restricted Access and Circulation
CO-L1581-A4-CONFIDPrinciple of Confidentiality
CO-L1581-A4-FINALIDADPrinciple of Purpose
CO-L1581-A4-LEGALIDADPrinciple of Legality
CO-L1581-A4-LIBERTADPrinciple of Freedom (Consent)
CO-L1581-A4-TRANSPARENCIAPrinciple of Transparency
CO-L1581-A5Sensitive Data Definition
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition