45% of Canadian PIPEDA you already have
COPPA already covers about 45% of Canadian PIPEDA, leaving
17 of 31 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 14
New work 17
No control in COPPA
maps directly to one in Canadian PIPEDA. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in COPPA reaches these. This is the list to scope.
PIPEDA-10.1Report of Breach to the Commissioner
PIPEDA-10.1(6)Real Risk of Significant Harm Assessment
PIPEDA-10.1-indNotification of Breach to Individuals
PIPEDA-10.2Notification to Other Organizations
PIPEDA-10.3Records of Breaches
PIPEDA-11Filing of Complaints with the Commissioner
PIPEDA-4.1.3Accountability for Transfers to Third Parties
PIPEDA-4.1.4Policies and Practices (Privacy Management Program)
PIPEDA-4.10Principle 10 - Challenging Compliance
PIPEDA-4.2.4New Purpose Requires New Consent
PIPEDA-4.8Principle 8 - Openness
PIPEDA-4.8.2Required Openness Information
PIPEDA-4.9Principle 9 - Individual Access
PIPEDA-4.9.4Access Response Timelines
PIPEDA-4.9.5Correction and Notation
PIPEDA-7Collection, Use and Disclosure Without Consent
PIPEDA-7.3Disclosure for Prospective Business Transaction
Show the 14 you already have
PIPEDA-4.1Principle 1 - Accountability
PIPEDA-4.2Principle 2 - Identifying Purposes
PIPEDA-4.3Principle 3 - Consent
PIPEDA-4.3.4Form of Consent Calibrated to Sensitivity
PIPEDA-4.3.8Withdrawal of Consent
PIPEDA-4.4Principle 4 - Limiting Collection
PIPEDA-4.5Principle 5 - Limiting Use, Disclosure and Retention
PIPEDA-4.5.3Secure Destruction and Retention
PIPEDA-4.6Principle 6 - Accuracy
PIPEDA-4.7Principle 7 - Safeguards
PIPEDA-4.7.3Categories of Safeguards
PIPEDA-4.7.4Employee Awareness of Safeguards
PIPEDA-5(3)Appropriate Purposes
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in COPPA to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition