23% of Danish Data Protection Act (Databeskyttelsesloven) you already have
China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) already covers about 23% of Danish Data Protection Act (Databeskyttelsesloven), leaving
17 of 22 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 5
New work 17
No control in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)
maps directly to one in Danish Data Protection Act (Databeskyttelsesloven). Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) reaches these. This is the list to scope.
DK-502-§1Supplementation and implementation of the GDPR
DK-502-§10Health and genetic data for research and statistics
DK-502-§11Processing of national identification numbers (CPR)
DK-502-§12Processing in the employment context
DK-502-§13Disclosure of consumer data and direct marketing
DK-502-§19-21Credit information agencies (kreditoplysningsbureauer)
DK-502-§2-4Scope, relationship to other law, and deceased persons
DK-502-§24Data protection officer (databeskyttelsesrådgiver)
DK-502-§26Prior consultation with Datatilsynet
DK-502-§27Datatilsynet establishment and supervision
DK-502-§29Datatilsynet information and inspection powers
DK-502-§31Third-country transfer determinations (post Schrems II)
DK-502-§37-38Supervision of the courts (Domstolsstyrelsen)
DK-502-§39-40Complaints and right to compensation
DK-502-§41Penalties (fines and imprisonment)
DK-502-§46-48Commencement, transitional and territorial scope
DK-502-§8Public-sector processing of criminal-offence data
Show the 5 you already have
DK-502-§14Transfers of personal data to third countries
DK-502-§3-AGEAge of consent for information society services (13)
DK-502-§5Purpose limitation
DK-502-§6Lawful basis for processing
DK-502-§7Sensitive and special categories of data
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ·
Today's edition