Framework overlap

Does China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) cover Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011)?

You hold China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) and have been told to do Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

30% of Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011) you already have

China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) already covers about 30% of Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011), leaving 16 of 23 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 7 New work 16

No control in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) maps directly to one in Bosnia and Herzegovina Law on Protection of Personal Data (2006, amended 2011). Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) reaches these. This is the list to scope.

BA-DPA-1
Purpose of the Law
BA-DPA-11
Data Security
BA-DPA-13
Personal Data Filing System
BA-DPA-14
Central Registry
BA-DPA-16
Confidentiality Requirement
BA-DPA-2
Scope of the Law
BA-DPA-22
Notification on Data Collection
BA-DPA-24
The Right to Personal Data Access
BA-DPA-27
Corrigenda and Deletion of Data
BA-DPA-29
Issuing Decisions Based on Automatic Data Processing
BA-DPA-30
Filing Complaints
BA-DPA-32
Liability for Damage
BA-DPA-35
Definition of the Agency
BA-DPA-40
Competencies of the Agency
BA-DPA-41
Control Carried Out by the Agency
BA-DPA-48
Offences and Fines
Show the 7 you already have
BA-DPA-12
Data Processing by a Processor
BA-DPA-18
Data Transfer Abroad
BA-DPA-4
Principles of Personal Data Processing
BA-DPA-5
Consent by a Data Subject
BA-DPA-6
The Right to Process Without the Data Subject's Consent
BA-DPA-7
Data Authenticity
BA-DPA-9
Processing of Special Categories of Personal Data

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition