50% of POPIA you already have
Belgium CyberFundamentals already covers about 50% of POPIA, leaving
4 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 4
New work 4
No control in Belgium CyberFundamentals
maps directly to one in POPIA. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in Belgium CyberFundamentals reaches these. This is the list to scope.
POPIASA-1Accountability, Processing Limitation, Lawful Basis, Codes
POPIASA-2Purpose Specification, Collection Limitation, Further Processing Limitation
POPIASA-6Transborder Information Flows, Direct Marketing
POPIASA-8Information Regulator Cooperation, Complaints, Enforcement
Show the 4 you already have
POPIASA-3Data Subject Rights (Access, Correction, Objection), Automated Decisions
POPIASA-4Special Personal Information, Children, Information Quality, Documentation
POPIASA-5Security Safeguards, Encryption, Access Control, Operator Obligations
POPIASA-7Information Officer, Records of Processing, Notification, Training
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Belgium CyberFundamentals to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition