22% of Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes you already have
Belgium CyberFundamentals already covers about 22% of Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes, leaving
28 of 36 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 8
New work 28
No control in Belgium CyberFundamentals
maps directly to one in Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in Belgium CyberFundamentals reaches these. This is the list to scope.
AEO-1AEO programme eligibility and legal basis
AEO-10Security training and awareness
AEO-12Crisis management and incident recovery
AEO-13Self-assessment and internal audit
AEO-14Customs procedures and declaration accuracy
AEO-15Mutual recognition arrangements
AEO-16AEO validation and re-validation
AEO-17Notification of changes
AEO-18Trade facilitation benefits realisation
AEO-19Suspension, withdrawal and revocation
AEO-20AEO governance and accountability
AEO-21Customs broker and forwarder oversight
AEO-22Sanctions and restricted party screening
AEO-23Documentation accuracy and tariff classification
AEO-3Commercial and transport records system
AEO-5Premises security and safety standards
AEO-6Cargo security and conveyance integrity
AEO-7Business partner security
P1-S4Mutual recognition (Customs-to-Customs)
P2-S4Technology utilization
P2-S6Trade facilitation benefits
P3-S1Inter-agency cooperation
P3-S2Single window facilitation
Show the 8 you already have
AEO-11Risk management and threat assessment
AEO-2Customs compliance record
AEO-9Information security and IT systems
P1-S1Advance electronic information
P2-S1Partnership programme (AEO)
P2-S3Authorization and validation
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Belgium CyberFundamentals to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition