Framework overlap

Does Azure Security Benchmark cover New Hampshire Data Privacy Act?

You hold Azure Security Benchmark and have been told to do New Hampshire Data Privacy Act. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

63% of New Hampshire Data Privacy Act you already have

Azure Security Benchmark already covers about 63% of New Hampshire Data Privacy Act, leaving 3 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 5 Likely covered 0 New work 3

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in Azure Security Benchmark reaches these. This is the list to scope.

NHPA-1
Applicability, Thresholds, and Scope
NHPA-2
Consumer Rights - Access, Correct, Delete, Portability, Appeal
NHPA-3
Opt-Out Rights, UOOM, and Universal Opt-Out Mechanism
Show the 5 you already have
NHPA-4
Sensitive Data, Children, and Minors 13-16 Opt-In Consent
NHPA-5
Privacy Notice, Data Minimisation, and Purpose Limitation
NHPA-6
Reasonable Data Security and Breach Response
NHPA-7
Data Protection Assessments and Processor Contracts
NHPA-8
AG Formella Enforcement, Permanent 60-Day Cure, and Penalties

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Azure Security Benchmark to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition