63% of Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements you already have
Azure Security Benchmark already covers about 63% of Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements, leaving
3 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 5
Likely covered 0
New work 3
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in Azure Security Benchmark reaches these. This is the list to scope.
NGCB-2Cybersecurity Best Practices Framework Adoption
NGCB-3Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Ongoing Risk Monitoring
NGCB-4Designated Cybersecurity Officer and Personnel Training
Show the 5 you already have
NGCB-1Regulation 5.260 Scope, Applicability, and Licensee Categories
NGCB-5Technical Security Controls - Access + Network + Encryption + Vulnerability + Logging
NGCB-6Incident Response, 72-Hour NGCB Notification, and Independent Investigation
NGCB-7Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management
NGCB-8Annual Independent Cybersecurity Assessment + Reporting + Board Oversight
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Azure Security Benchmark to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition