Framework overlap

Does Azure Security Benchmark cover ISO/IEC 27400:2022?

You hold Azure Security Benchmark and have been told to do ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

41% of ISO/IEC 27400:2022 you already have

Azure Security Benchmark already covers about 41% of ISO/IEC 27400:2022, leaving 16 of 27 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 8 Likely covered 3 New work 16

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in Azure Security Benchmark reaches these. This is the list to scope.

27011-4
Structure of this document
27400-10.1
Vulnerability Management for IoT
27400-10.2
Incident Response for IoT
27400-10.3
Logging and Monitoring
27400-11.1
Decommissioning and Disposal
27400-11.2
Supplier and Third-Party Management
27400-4
IoT overview and concepts
27400-5.3
Network and communication risks
27400-7.2
Gateway Security
27400-8.1
Platform and Backend Security
27400-8.2
Data Protection in IoT
27400-8.3
Maintenance and update security
27400-8.4
Decommissioning security
27400-9.1
Privacy by Design for IoT
27400-9.2
Consent and Transparency
27400-9.3
Data Subject Rights for IoT
Show the 11 you already have
27400-5.4
Data and privacy risks
27400-6.1
Secure Device Design
27400-6.2
Device Identity and Authentication
27400-6.4
Default Configuration Security
27400-6.5
Security monitoring and incident response
27400-7.1
Network Security for IoT
27400-7.3
Data minimization and purpose limitation
27400-7.4
Data retention and deletion
27400-5.1
IoT Security and Privacy Governance
27400-5.2
IoT Risk Assessment
27400-6.3
Secure Update Mechanism

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Azure Security Benchmark to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition