Framework overlap

Does Azure Security Benchmark cover India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI)?

You hold Azure Security Benchmark and have been told to do India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

25% of India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI) you already have

Azure Security Benchmark already covers about 25% of India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI), leaving 6 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 2 New work 6

No control in Azure Security Benchmark maps directly to one in India Account Aggregator Framework (RBI). Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in Azure Security Benchmark reaches these. This is the list to scope.

RBI-AA-Audit-Logging-IT-System-Audit-Consent-Lifecycle-Authentication
RBI AA Audit + Logging - IT System Audit + Consent Lifecycle Logging + Customer Authentication + Bi-Annual Audit + RBI Inspection + Sahamati Compliance Reporting
RBI-AA-CustomerProtection-Grievance-Redressal-Fees-Transparency-RBI-Ombudsman
RBI AA Customer Protection - Grievance Redressal Mechanism + Fee Transparency + RBI Integrated Ombudsman + Customer Awareness + Internal Grievance Officer + Sahamati Dispute Resolu
RBI-AA-IT-DataProtection-Transience-NoStorage-E2EE-DataLocalisation-IS-PolicyFramework
RBI AA IT + Data Protection - Data Transience + No Storage at AA + End-to-End Encryption + Data Localisation in India + Information Security Policy + RBI IT Framework for NBFC-AA
RBI-AA-IncidentResponse-Resilience-RBI-CERT-In-BCP-DR-Continuity
RBI AA Incident Response + Resilience - Cyber Incident Reporting to RBI + CERT-In + Business Continuity + Disaster Recovery + Resilience + Customer Communication + Forensics
RBI-AA-Registration-Licensing-NBFC-AA-NetOwnedFunds-FitAndProper-MD2016
RBI AA Registration + Licensing - NBFC-Account Aggregator (NBFC-AA) Category + Net Owned Funds + Fit and Proper Criteria + RBI Master Direction 2016 + Governance
RBI-AA-Sahamati-SRO-IndustryStandards-DPDPAct-RBI-CSF-Coord-DPI-IndiaStack
RBI AA Sahamati SRO + Industry Standards + DPDP Act 2023 + RBI Cyber Security Framework + Coordination with DPI India Stack + Cross-Sector + International AA Equivalents
Show the 2 you already have
RBI-AA-ConsentArchitecture-ConsentArtefact-ExplicitConsent-PurposeLimitation-CustomerDashboard-ORS-CMP
RBI AA Consent Architecture - Consent Artefact + Explicit Customer Consent + Purpose Limitation + Customer Consent Dashboard + Online Revocation Service + Consent Management Provid
RBI-AA-Ecosystem-FIPs-FIUs-Interoperability-Onboarding-Sahamati-DPI-IndiaStack
RBI AA Ecosystem - Financial Information Providers (FIPs) + Financial Information Users (FIUs) + Interoperability + Sahamati SRO Onboarding + DPI India Stack + Cross-Sector Regulat

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Azure Security Benchmark to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition