Does AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) cover ICH Q10?

83% of ICH Q10 you already have

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) already covers about 83% of ICH Q10, leaving 1 of 6 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 2 Likely covered 3 New work 1

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) reaches these. This is the list to scope.

ICH-Q10-Lifecycle-PharmDev-TechTransfer-CommMfg-ProductDiscontinuation

ICH Q10 - 4 Product Lifecycle Stages - Pharmaceutical Development + Technology Transfer + Commercial Manufacturing + Product Discontinuation

Show the 5 you already have

ICH-Q10-Section2-MgmtResponsibility-Leadership-QualityPolicy-Planning-Review

ICH Q10 Section 2 - Management Responsibility + Leadership + Quality Policy + Planning + Resources + Communication + Management Review

ICH-Q10-Section3-ContinualImprovement-ProcessPerformance-CAPA-ChangeMgmt-MgmtReview

ICH Q10 Section 3 - Continual Improvement + Process Performance and Product Quality Monitoring + CAPA + Change Management + Management Review

ICH-Q10-Scope-PQS-ICH-Q8-Q9-Q11-Q12-ISO9001-GMP-Coord

ICH Q10 - Scope + Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) + ICH Q8/Q9/Q11/Q12 + ISO 9001 + GMP Coordination

ICH-Q10-Section1-Enablers-KnowledgeMgmt-QRM-FoundationICH-Q8-Q9

ICH Q10 Section 1 - PQS Enablers + Knowledge Management + Quality Risk Management (ICH Q9 Foundation)

ICH-Q10-Section2-Outsourced-Ownership-Vendor-Supplier-CMO-CRO

ICH Q10 Section 2 - Outsourced Activities + Management of Materials + Change of Ownership + CMO + CRO + Supplier Management

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair · Today's edition