Framework overlap

Does AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar cover OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

You hold AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and have been told to do OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

100% of OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) you already have

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar already covers about 100% of OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM), leaving 0 of 6 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 6 Likely covered 0 New work 0

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar reaches these. This is the list to scope.

Nothing. Every control is reached.

Show the 6 you already have
DSOMM-1
Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
DSOMM-2
Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling
DSOMM-3
Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management
DSOMM-4
Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing
DSOMM-5
Information Gathering, Logging, Monitoring, and Incident Response
DSOMM-6
Metrics, Maturity Measurement, and Continuous Improvement

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition