29% of NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 you already have
ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents already covers about 29% of NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2, leaving
24 of 34 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 8
Likely covered 2
New work 24
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents reaches these. This is the list to scope.
800-124r2-2.1Mobile Device Threat Model
800-124r2-2.2Mobile Device Policy
800-124r2-3.1Enterprise Mobility Management Deployment
800-124r2-3.2Device Authentication and Enrollment
800-124r2-3.3Device Hardening Baselines
800-124r2-3.4Mobile Application Vetting
800-124r2-3.5Mobile Application Allow and Deny Lists
800-124r2-4.1Data Protection on Mobile Devices
800-124r2-4.2Data Communication Protection
800-124r2-4.3Lost or Stolen Device Procedures
800-124r2-5.1Mobile Threat Defense Monitoring
800-124r2-5.2Mobile Operating System Updates
800-124r2-5.3User Awareness for Mobile Risks
800-124r2-6.1BYOD Considerations
800-124r2-6.2Corporate Owned Device Models
800-124r2-7.1Mobile Device Lifecycle Management
800-124r2-7.2Mobile Device Decommissioning
800-124r2-8.1Identity and Access Integration
800-124r2-8.2Continuous Compliance Reporting
MD124-CTL-03Remote Wipe Capability
MD124-CTL-05Jailbreak/Root Detection
MD124-TECH-01Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)
MD124-TECH-02Mobile Threat Defense (MTD)
MD124-TECH-04Mobile Application Management (MAM)
Show the 10 you already have
MD124-CTL-01Device Authentication and Lock
MD124-CTL-02Device Encryption
MD124-CTL-06Network Security for Mobile
MD124-POL-01Mobile Device Security Policy
MD124-POL-03Mobile Data Protection Policy
MD124-POL-04Mobile Device Lifecycle Management
MD124-TECH-03Mobile Application Vetting
MD124-TECH-05VPN and Secure Communication
MD124-CTL-04OS and Application Updates
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition