Framework overlap

Does ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents cover Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

You hold ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and have been told to do Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

38% of Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) you already have

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents already covers about 38% of Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia), leaving 5 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 3 New work 5

No control in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps directly to one in Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents reaches these. This is the list to scope.

AU-MSA-Enforcement-Section-22-Minister-Powers-No-Civil-Penalty-2023-McMillan-Review-Reform-2024-Anti-Slavery-Commissioner
Australia MSA Enforcement + Section 22 + Minister Powers + 2023 McMillan Review + 2024 Anti-Slavery Commissioner
AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-5-Effectiveness-Section-16-1e-Assurance-KPIs-Continuous-Improvement
Australia MSA Mandatory Criterion 5 + Effectiveness + Section 16(1)(e) + Independent Assurance + KPIs + Continuous Improvement
AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-6-7-Consultation-Section-16-1f-1g-Joint-Statement-Other-Information-Governance
Australia MSA Mandatory Criteria 6 + 7 + Consultation + Joint Statement + Section 16(1)(f) + (g) + Governance
AU-MSA-Reporting-Period-Submission-Section-13B-Six-Months-Annual-Statement-Lodgement-Register-Section-18
Australia MSA Reporting Period + Section 13 + Six Months Post Period End + Annual + Register + Section 18
AU-MSA-Scope-Act-153-2018-Assent-10-December-2018-Effective-1-January-2019-Section-13-AUD-100M-Home-Affairs
Australia MSA Scope + Act 153 of 2018 + Assent 10 December 2018 + Effective 1 January 2019 + Section 13 + AUD 100M + Home Affairs
Show the 3 you already have
AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criteria-1-2-Identity-Structure-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1a-16-1b
Australia MSA Mandatory Criteria 1 + 2 + Identity + Structure + Operations + Supply Chain + Section 16(1)(a) + (b)
AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-3-Modern-Slavery-Risks-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1c-Sector-Geographic-Indicators
Australia MSA Mandatory Criterion 3 + Modern Slavery Risks + Section 16(1)(c) + Sector + Geographic Indicators
AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-4-Actions-Section-16-1d-Due-Diligence-Supplier-Code-Worker-Voice-Recruitment-Fees
Australia MSA Mandatory Criterion 4 + Actions + Section 16(1)(d) + Due Diligence + Supplier Code + Worker Voice + Recruitment Fees

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition