Framework overlap

Does AS9100D:2016 cover ISO 22000:2018?

You hold AS9100D:2016 and have been told to do ISO 22000:2018. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

38% of ISO 22000:2018 you already have

AS9100D:2016 already covers about 38% of ISO 22000:2018, leaving 34 of 55 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 7 Likely covered 14 New work 34

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in AS9100D:2016 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

10.3
Update of the food safety management system
4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
4.3
Determining the scope of the food safety management system
4.4
Food safety management system
5.2
Policy
5.2.1
Establishing the food safety policy
5.2.2
Communicating the food safety policy
6.3
Planning of changes
7.1
Resources
7.1.2
People
7.1.3
Infrastructure
7.1.4
Work environment
7.1.5
Externally developed elements of the food safety management system
7.2
Competence
7.3
Awareness
7.4.2
External communication
7.4.3
Internal communication
7.5.2
Creating and updating
7.5.3
Control of documented information
8.5.4
Hazard control plan (HACCP/OPRP plan)
8.6
Updating the information specifying the PRPs and the hazard control plan
8.8
Verification related to PRPs and the hazard control plan
8.8.1
Verification
8.8.2
Analysis of results of verification activities
8.9
Control of product and process nonconformities
8.9.2
Corrections
8.9.3
Corrective actions
8.9.4
Handling of potentially unsafe products
8.9.5
Withdrawal/recall
9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
9.2
Internal audit
9.3
Management review
9.3.2
Management review input
9.3.3
Management review output
Show the 21 you already have
10.1
Nonconformity and corrective action
5.1
Leadership and commitment
5.3
Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
7.1.6
Control of externally provided processes, products or services
7.5
Documented information
8.1
Operational planning and control
10.2
Continual improvement
4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
6.2
Objectives of the food safety management system and planning to achieve them
7.4
Communication
8.2
Prerequisite programmes (PRPs)
8.3
Traceability system
8.4
Emergency preparedness and response
8.4.2
Handling of emergencies and incidents
8.5
Hazard control
8.5.1
Preliminary steps to enable hazard analysis
8.5.2
Hazard analysis
8.5.3
Validation of control measure(s) and combinations of control measures
8.7
Control of monitoring and measuring
9.1.2
Analysis and evaluation

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in AS9100D:2016 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition