Framework overlap

Does AS9100D cover PTES?

You hold AS9100D and have been told to do PTES. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

57% of PTES you already have

AS9100D already covers about 57% of PTES, leaving 3 of 7 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 1 Likely covered 3 New work 3

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in AS9100D reaches these. This is the list to scope.

PTESPHASE-5
Exploitation
PTESPHASE-6
Post Exploitation
PTESPHASE-7
Reporting and Cleanup
Show the 4 you already have
PTESPHASE-1
Pre-Engagement Interactions and Scoping
PTESPHASE-2
Intelligence Gathering (OSINT)
PTESPHASE-3
Threat Modeling
PTESPHASE-4
Vulnerability Analysis

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in AS9100D to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition