Framework overlap

Does AS9100D cover NATO AQAP 2110?

You hold AS9100D and have been told to do NATO AQAP 2110. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

100% of NATO AQAP 2110 you already have

AS9100D already covers about 100% of NATO AQAP 2110, leaving 0 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 8 New work 0

No control in AS9100D maps directly to one in NATO AQAP 2110. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in AS9100D reaches these. This is the list to scope.

Nothing. Every control is reached.

Show the 8 you already have
AQAP2110-1
Quality Management System Aligned to ISO 9001 plus NATO Supplementary Requirements
AQAP2110-2
Government Quality Assurance Representative (GQAR) Authority and Access
AQAP2110-3
Design and Development Control - NATO plus ISO 13485 Cross-Walk
AQAP2110-4
Configuration Management and Change Control
AQAP2110-5
Risk and Opportunity Management
AQAP2110-6
Subcontractor Supply Chain Control plus Counterfeit Material Prevention
AQAP2110-7
Production, Special Processes, Inspection, Testing, and Records
AQAP2110-8
Internal Audit, Management Review, Corrective Action, CofC, and Continual Improvement

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in AS9100D to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition