Framework overlap

Does APRA CPS 234 cover OWASP ASVS?

You hold APRA CPS 234 and have been told to do OWASP ASVS. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

57% of OWASP ASVS you already have

APRA CPS 234 already covers about 57% of OWASP ASVS, leaving 6 of 14 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 8 New work 6

No control in APRA CPS 234 maps directly to one in OWASP ASVS. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in APRA CPS 234 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

OWASPASVS-11
Business Logic Verification (V11)
OWASPASVS-12
File and Resources (V12)
OWASPASVS-13
API and Web Service Security (V13)
OWASPASVS-14
Configuration and Hardening (V14)
OWASPASVS-3
Session Management (V3)
OWASPASVS-5
Validation, Sanitization and Encoding (V5 + V5.3)
Show the 8 you already have
OWASPASVS-1
Architecture, Design and Threat Modelling (V1)
OWASPASVS-10
Malicious Code Verification (V10)
OWASPASVS-2
Authentication and Credential Storage (V2 + V2.4)
OWASPASVS-4
Access Control (V4 + V4.3)
OWASPASVS-6
Stored Cryptography (V6)
OWASPASVS-7
Error Handling and Logging (V7)
OWASPASVS-8
Data Protection (V8 + V8.3)
OWASPASVS-9
Communication Security (V9)

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in APRA CPS 234 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition