Framework overlap

Does APRA CPS 234 cover IATF 16949:2016?

You hold APRA CPS 234 and have been told to do IATF 16949:2016. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

60% of IATF 16949:2016 you already have

APRA CPS 234 already covers about 60% of IATF 16949:2016, leaving 4 of 10 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 2 Likely covered 4 New work 4

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in APRA CPS 234 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

IATF16949-Clause5-Leadership-Corporate-QualityPolicy-Roles
IATF 16949 Clause 5 - Leadership + Top Management Commitment + Corporate Responsibility + Quality Policy + Roles
IATF16949-Clause7-Support-Resources-MSA-Calibration-Competence-Documents
IATF 16949 Clause 7 - Support + Resources + Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) + Calibration + Competence + Documented Info
IATF16949-Clause8-Nonconforming-Concession-PPAP-Submission
IATF 16949 Clause 8 - Control of Nonconforming Outputs + Customer Concession + Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)
IATF16949-Scope-IATF-Members-ISO9001-Annex-SL-Sector-CSR
IATF 16949:2016 - Scope + IATF Member OEMs + ISO 9001:2015 Annex SL Integration + Automotive Sector + Customer Specific Requirements
Show the 6 you already have
IATF16949-Clause10-Improvement-Nonconformity-CorrectiveAction-Problem-ErrorProof
IATF 16949 Clause 10 - Improvement + Nonconformity + Corrective Action + Problem Solving + Error Proofing + Continual Improvement
IATF16949-Clause9-Performance-Monitoring-InternalAudit-ManagementReview
IATF 16949 Clause 9 - Performance Evaluation + Monitoring + Internal Audit + Manufacturing Process Audit + Management Review
IATF16949-Clause4-Context-Scope-CustomerSpecific-ProductSafety
IATF 16949 Clause 4 - Context of Organization + QMS Scope + Customer Specific Requirements + Product Safety
IATF16949-Clause6-Planning-Risk-Contingency-Objectives-Change
IATF 16949 Clause 6 - Planning + Risks and Opportunities + Contingency Plans + Quality Objectives + Change
IATF16949-Clause8-Operation-APQP-Design-Production-ControlPlan-SpecialChars
IATF 16949 Clause 8 - Operation Planning + APQP + Design + Special Characteristics + Production + Control Plan + Set-Up Verification
IATF16949-Clause8-Supplier-QMS-Development-Externally-Provided
IATF 16949 Clause 8 Supplier - Control of Externally Provided Processes + Type and Extent + Supplier QMS Development

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in APRA CPS 234 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition