Framework overlap

Does APPI cover PDPA Thailand?

You hold APPI and have been told to do PDPA Thailand. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

75% of PDPA Thailand you already have

APPI already covers about 75% of PDPA Thailand, leaving 2 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 6 Likely covered 0 New work 2

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in APPI reaches these. This is the list to scope.

PDPATH-1
Scope, Extra-Territorial Application, Lawful Basis, and Notice
PDPATH-2
Consent Requirements and Special Consent for Sensitive Data
Show the 6 you already have
PDPATH-3
Data Subject Rights, Automated Decisions, Accuracy
PDPATH-4
DPIA, Privacy by Design, Children's Data
PDPATH-5
Security Measures and Data Protection
PDPATH-6
Cross-Border Transfer and Processor Engagement
PDPATH-7
DPO, Records of Processing, Retention, Marketing, Training
PDPATH-8
Data Breach Notification, Complaints, Compliance, Enforcement

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in APPI to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition