Framework overlap

Does API 1164 cover Taiwan PDPA?

You hold API 1164 and have been told to do Taiwan PDPA. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

38% of Taiwan PDPA you already have

API 1164 already covers about 38% of Taiwan PDPA, leaving 5 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 1 Likely covered 2 New work 5

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in API 1164 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

TAIWAN-1
Scope, Lawful Basis (Taiwan)
TAIWAN-5
Security
TAIWAN-6
Cross-Border + Processor
TAIWAN-7
DPO + Governance
TAIWAN-8
Breach + Enforcement
Show the 3 you already have
TAIWAN-3
Data Subject Rights
TAIWAN-2
Consent, Notice, Sensitive Data
TAIWAN-4
DPIA, Privacy by Design

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in API 1164 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition