Framework overlap

Does API 1164 cover SEC Climate Disclosure Rule?

You hold API 1164 and have been told to do SEC Climate Disclosure Rule. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

20% of SEC Climate Disclosure Rule you already have

API 1164 already covers about 20% of SEC Climate Disclosure Rule, leaving 4 of 5 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 1 Likely covered 0 New work 4

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in API 1164 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

SECCLIM-1
Governance: Board Oversight, Management Role
SECCLIM-3
Strategy: Material Impacts, Time Horizons, Adaptation
SECCLIM-4
Metrics and Targets: GHG Emissions, Climate Targets
SECCLIM-5
Attestation and Assurance
Show the 1 you already have
SECCLIM-2
Risk Management: Identification, Assessment, Integration

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in API 1164 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition