Framework overlap

Does API 1164 cover ISO 56002?

You hold API 1164 and have been told to do ISO 56002. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

10% of ISO 56002 you already have

API 1164 already covers about 10% of ISO 56002, leaving 146 of 163 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 17 New work 146

No control in API 1164 maps directly to one in ISO 56002. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in API 1164 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

ISO-22313-10.1
Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-22313-10.2
Continual improvement
ISO-22313-4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-22313-4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-22313-4.3
Determining the scope of the BCMS
ISO-22313-4.4
Business continuity management system
ISO-22313-5.3
Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
ISO-22313-6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
ISO-22313-7.1
Resources
ISO-22313-7.2
Competence
ISO-22313-7.3
Awareness
ISO-22313-7.4
Communication
ISO-22313-7.5
Documented information
ISO-22313-9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
ISO-22313-9.2
Internal audit
ISO-22313-9.3
Management review
ISO-37002-10.1
Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-37002-10.2
Continual improvement
ISO-37002-4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-37002-4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-37002-4.3
Determining the scope of the whistleblowing management system
ISO-37002-4.4
Whistleblowing management system
ISO-37002-5.2
Whistleblowing policy
ISO-37002-5.3
Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
ISO-37002-6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
ISO-37002-6.2
Whistleblowing management system objectives and planning
ISO-37002-7.1
Resources
ISO-37002-7.2
Competence
ISO-37002-7.3
Awareness and training
ISO-37002-7.4
Communication
ISO-37002-7.5
Documented information
ISO-37002-9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
ISO-37002-9.2
Internal audit
ISO-37002-9.3
Management review
ISO-39001-10.2
Continual improvement
ISO-39001-4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-39001-4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-39001-4.3
Determining the scope of the RTS management system
ISO-39001-4.4
RTS management system
ISO-39001-5.2
RTS policy
ISO-39001-5.3
Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
ISO-39001-6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
ISO-39001-6.2
RTS performance factors
ISO-39001-6.3
RTS objectives and planning to achieve them
ISO-39001-7.1
Resources
ISO-39001-7.2
Competence
ISO-39001-7.3
Awareness
ISO-39001-7.4
Communication
ISO-39001-7.5
Documented information
ISO-39001-9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
ISO-39001-9.2
Internal audit
ISO-39001-9.3
Management review
ISO-41001-10.2
Continual improvement
ISO-41001-4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-41001-4.4
Facility management system
ISO-41001-5.2
Facility management policy
ISO-41001-5.3
Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
ISO-41001-6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
ISO-41001-6.2
Facility management objectives and planning to achieve them
ISO-41001-6.3
Planning of changes
ISO-41001-7.1
Resources
ISO-41001-7.2
Competence
ISO-41001-7.3
Awareness
ISO-41001-7.4
Communication
ISO-41001-7.5
Documented information
ISO-41001-7.6
Organizational knowledge
ISO-41001-9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
ISO-41001-9.2
Internal audit
ISO-41001-9.3
Management review
ISO-50001-10.1
Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-50001-10.2
Continual improvement
ISO-50001-4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-50001-4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-50001-4.3
Determining the scope of the EnMS
ISO-50001-4.4
Energy management system
ISO-50001-5.2
Energy policy
ISO-50001-5.3
Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
ISO-50001-6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
ISO-50001-6.2
Objectives, energy targets and planning to achieve them
ISO-50001-6.3
Energy review
ISO-50001-6.4
Energy performance indicators (EnPIs)
ISO-50001-6.5
Energy baseline (EnB)
ISO-50001-6.6
Planning for the collection of energy data
ISO-50001-7.1
Resources
ISO-50001-7.2
Competence
ISO-50001-7.3
Awareness
ISO-50001-7.4
Communication
ISO-50001-7.5
Documented information
ISO-50001-9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation of energy performance
ISO-50001-9.2
Evaluation of compliance with legal and other requirements
ISO-50001-9.3
Internal audit
ISO-50001-9.4
Management review
ISO-56002-10.3
Continual improvement
ISO-56002-4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-56002-4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO-56002-4.4
Establishing the innovation management system
ISO-56002-5.2
Innovation policy
ISO-56002-5.3
Innovation vision and strategy
ISO-56002-5.4
Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
ISO-56002-5.5
Organizational culture
ISO-56002-6.1
Actions to address opportunities and risks
ISO-56002-6.2
Innovation objectives and planning to achieve them
ISO-56002-6.3
Organizational structures
ISO-56002-6.4
Innovation portfolios
ISO-56002-7.1
Resources
ISO-56002-7.2
Competence
ISO-56002-7.3
Awareness
ISO-56002-7.4
Communication
ISO-56002-7.5
Documented information
ISO-56002-7.6
Tools and methods
ISO-56002-7.7
Strategic intelligence management
ISO-56002-7.8
Intellectual property management
ISO-56002-8.1
Operational planning and control
ISO-56002-8.2
Innovation initiatives
ISO-56002-8.3.1
Identify opportunities
ISO-56002-8.3.2
Create concepts
ISO-56002-8.3.3
Validate concepts
ISO-56002-8.3.5
Deploy solutions
ISO-56002-9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
ISO-56002-9.2
Internal audit
ISO-56002-9.3
Management review
ISO56002-10.1
Deviations, nonconformities and corrective actions
ISO56002-10.2
Continual improvement
ISO56002-4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
ISO56002-4.2
Understanding needs and expectations of interested parties
ISO56002-4.3
Determining scope of innovation management system
ISO56002-4.4
Establishing innovation management system
ISO56002-4.5
Innovation vision, strategy, policy and objectives culture
ISO56002-5.2
Innovation policy
ISO56002-5.3
Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
ISO56002-6.1
Actions to address opportunities and risks
ISO56002-6.2
Innovation objectives and planning to achieve them
ISO56002-6.3
Organizational structures
ISO56002-6.4
Innovation portfolios
ISO56002-7.1.1
Resources for innovation
ISO56002-7.2
Competence
ISO56002-7.3
Awareness
ISO56002-7.5
Documented information
ISO56002-7.6
Tools and methods
ISO56002-7.7
Strategic intelligence management
ISO56002-7.8
Intellectual property management
ISO56002-8.1
Operational planning and control
ISO56002-8.3
Innovation processes (opportunity to deployment)
ISO56002-9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
ISO56002-9.2
Internal audit
ISO56002-9.3
Management review
Show the 17 you already have
ISO-22313-5.1
Leadership and commitment
ISO-22313-5.2
Policy
ISO-22313-6.2
Business continuity objectives and plans to achieve them
ISO-22313-6.3
Planning changes to the BCMS
ISO-37002-5.1
Leadership and commitment
ISO-39001-10.1
Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-39001-5.1
Leadership and commitment
ISO-41001-10.1
Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-41001-4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.3
Determining the scope of the FM management system
ISO-41001-5.1
Leadership and commitment
ISO-50001-5.1
Leadership and commitment
ISO-56002-10.2
Deviation, nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-56002-4.3
Determining the scope of the innovation management system
ISO-56002-5.1
Leadership and commitment
ISO-56002-8.3.4
Develop solutions
ISO56002-5.1
Leadership and commitment

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in API 1164 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition