Framework overlap

Does API 1164 cover ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)?

You hold API 1164 and have been told to do ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

50% of ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) you already have

API 1164 already covers about 50% of ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions), leaving 4 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 4 New work 4

No control in API 1164 maps directly to one in ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions). Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in API 1164 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

ILO-FPRW-Cat4-Discrimination-EqualRemuneration-C100-C111
ILO Fundamental Category 4 - Elimination of Discrimination + Equal Remuneration (C100) + Discrimination Employment and Occupation (C111)
ILO-FPRW-Implementation-DueDiligence-Grievance-MigrantWorkers-Wages
ILO FPRW Implementation - Human Rights Due Diligence + Grievance Mechanism + Migrant Worker Protection + Wages + Hours + Policy Commitment
ILO-FPRW-Scope-1998Declaration-2022Amendment-CoreConventions-ILO187States
ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work - Scope + 1998 Adoption + 2022 OSH Amendment + 10 Core Conventions + 187 Member States
ILO-FPRW-SupplyChain-Reporting-Training-Coord-UNGC-OECD-UNGP-CSDDD
ILO FPRW - Supply Chain Labour Standards + Public Reporting + Worker Training + Coordination UN Global Compact + OECD MNE + UNGPs + EU CSDDD + Modern Slavery Acts
Show the 4 you already have
ILO-FPRW-Cat1-FOA-CollectiveBargaining-C87-C98
ILO Fundamental Category 1 - Freedom of Association (C87) + Effective Recognition of Right to Collective Bargaining (C98) + Trade Unions
ILO-FPRW-Cat2-ForcedLabour-C29-C105-Protocol2014
ILO Fundamental Category 2 - Elimination of Forced or Compulsory Labour (C29 + C105) + 2014 Forced Labour Protocol + Modern Slavery
ILO-FPRW-Cat3-ChildLabour-MinimumAge-WorstForms-C138-C182
ILO Fundamental Category 3 - Effective Abolition of Child Labour (C138 Minimum Age + C182 Worst Forms)
ILO-FPRW-Cat5-OSH-SafeHealthyEnvironment-C155-C187-2022Amendment
ILO Fundamental Category 5 - Safe and Healthy Working Environment (C155 + C187) + 2022 Amendment Adding OSH as Fundamental Right

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in API 1164 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition