19% of Aged Care Quality Standards (Australia) you already have
API 1164 already covers about 19% of Aged Care Quality Standards (Australia), leaving
34 of 42 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 1
Likely covered 7
New work 34
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in API 1164 reaches these. This is the list to scope.
ACQS-1Consumer Dignity and Choice
ACQS-1-1Dignity and Respect
ACQS-1-2Consumer Choice and Independence
ACQS-1-3Information and Informed Consent
ACQS-2Ongoing Assessment and Planning with Consumers
ACQS-2-1Assessment of Needs
ACQS-2-2Care and Services Planning
ACQS-2-3Regular Reassessment
ACQS-3Personal Care and Clinical Care
ACQS-3-2Antimicrobial Stewardship
ACQS-3-3Minimising Restrictive Practices
ACQS-4Services and Supports for Daily Living
ACQS-4-1Daily Living Services
ACQS-5Organisation's Service Environment
ACQS-5-2Furniture, Fittings, and Equipment
ACQS-6Feedback and Complaints
ACQS-6-1Feedback and Complaints Process
ACQS-7-1Workforce Planning
ACQS-7-2Ongoing Education and Training
ACQS-8Organisational Governance
ACQS-8-1Effective Governance
ACQS-CDCConsumer-Directed Care (Home Care)
ACQS-FINFinancial and Prudential Standards
ACQS-IPCInfection Prevention and Control
ACQS-MEDMedication Management
ACQS-NUTRITIONNutrition and Hydration
ACQS-OPEN-DISCOpen Disclosure
ACQS-PALLIATIVEPalliative and End-of-Life Care
ACQS-QINational Quality Indicators
ACQS-RPRestrictive Practices Authorisation
Show the 8 you already have
ACQS-3-1Safe and Effective Care
ACQS-8-2Clinical Governance
ACQS-8-3Continuous Improvement
ACQS-CONT-IMPROVContinuous Improvement Plan
ACQS-SIRSSerious Incident Response Scheme
ACQS-WORKER-REGAged Care Worker Screening and Code of Conduct
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in API 1164 to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition