37% of China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) you already have
Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) already covers about 37% of China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL), leaving
33 of 52 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 19
New work 33
No control in Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11)
maps directly to one in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) reaches these. This is the list to scope.
PIPL-Art14Consent Requirements
PIPL-Art15Right to Withdraw Consent
PIPL-Art16No Coerced Consent / No Service Refusal
PIPL-Art17Notice Content Before Handling
PIPL-Art22Transfer Due to Merger or Restructuring
PIPL-Art24Automated Decision-Making
PIPL-Art3Scope and Extraterritorial Application
PIPL-Art30Enhanced Notice for Sensitive PI
PIPL-Art4Definition of Personal Information and Handling
PIPL-Art40Data Localisation and Security Assessment for CIIOs
PIPL-Art41Foreign Authority Requests Require Approval
PIPL-Art42Blocklist of Overseas Recipients
PIPL-Art43Reciprocal Countermeasures
PIPL-Art44Right to Know and Decide
PIPL-Art45Right to Access, Copy and Portability
PIPL-Art46Right to Correction and Completion
PIPL-Art47Right to Deletion
PIPL-Art48Right to Explanation of Handling Rules
PIPL-Art49Rights of Deceased's Next of Kin
PIPL-Art50Request-Handling Mechanism and Remedy
PIPL-Art51Security Measures and Management System
PIPL-Art52Designation of a DPO
PIPL-Art53Domestic Representative for Overseas Handlers
PIPL-Art54Regular Compliance Audits
PIPL-Art55Personal Information Protection Impact Assessment
PIPL-Art56PIPIA Content and Retention
PIPL-Art58Large Platform Obligations
PIPL-Art66Administrative Penalties
PIPL-Art69Civil Liability (Fault Presumed)
PIPL-Art7Openness and Transparency
PIPL-Art70Public Interest Litigation
PIPL-Art71Public Security and Criminal Liability
Show the 19 you already have
PIPL-Art13Legal Bases for Handling
PIPL-Art19Retention Period Limitation
PIPL-Art21Entrusted Handling (Processors)
PIPL-Art23Provision of PI to Third Parties
PIPL-Art25Public Disclosure Prohibited Without Consent
PIPL-Art26Image Collection in Public Places
PIPL-Art27Handling Already-Disclosed PI
PIPL-Art28Sensitive PI Definition and Threshold
PIPL-Art29Separate Consent for Sensitive PI
PIPL-Art31Minors Under 14
PIPL-Art32Sectoral and Administrative Restrictions
PIPL-Art35State Organs Handling for Statutory Duties
PIPL-Art38Cross-Border Transfer Legal Mechanisms
PIPL-Art39Notice and Separate Consent for Cross-Border
PIPL-Art5Lawfulness, Good Faith, Necessity
PIPL-Art57Breach Remediation and Notification
PIPL-Art6Purpose Limitation and Minimisation
PIPL-Art8Quality of Personal Information
PIPL-Art9Security Responsibility of Handlers
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition