Does Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) cover AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF)?

65% of AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF) you already have

Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) already covers about 65% of AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF), leaving 9 of 26 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 17 New work 9

No control in Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) maps directly to one in AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF). Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) reaches these. This is the list to scope.

PMF-A.1

Individual Access Rights

PMF-A.2

Access Request Process

PMF-AN.1

Privacy Notice

PMF-AN.3

Privacy Agreements

PMF-D.1

Third-Party Disclosure Controls

PMF-M.2

Privacy Policies and Procedures

PMF-M.3

Privacy Risk Assessment

PMF-ME.1

Privacy Program Monitoring

PMF-URD.3

Secure Disposal

Show the 17 you already have

PMF-AN.2

Purpose Specification

PMF-CC.1

Lawful and Fair Collection

PMF-CC.2

Collection Limitation

PMF-CC.3

Consent Mechanisms

PMF-D.2

Third-Party Agreements

PMF-D.3

Onward Transfer Accountability

PMF-DI.1

Data Accuracy

PMF-DI.2

Data Quality Processes

PMF-M.1

Privacy Program Governance

PMF-M.4

Privacy Incident Management

PMF-ME.2

Complaint Handling

PMF-ME.3

Enforcement and Remediation

PMF-SP.1

Information Security Program

PMF-SP.2

Security Safeguards

PMF-SP.3

Security Testing and Monitoring

PMF-URD.1

Use Limitation

PMF-URD.2

Retention Periods

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Angola Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 22/11) to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair · Today's edition