Framework overlap

Does ACSC Essential Eight cover PSD2 SCA?

You hold ACSC Essential Eight and have been told to do PSD2 SCA. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

33% of PSD2 SCA you already have

ACSC Essential Eight already covers about 33% of PSD2 SCA, leaving 4 of 6 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 2 New work 4

No control in ACSC Essential Eight maps directly to one in PSD2 SCA. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ACSC Essential Eight reaches these. This is the list to scope.

PSDTWO-3
Common and Secure Communication, API Access for AISPs and PISPs
PSDTWO-4
Fraud Reporting and Incident Management
PSDTWO-5
Customer Authentication Methods, Biometric Controls, Device Binding
PSDTWO-6
Governance, Risk Management, Compliance Monitoring
Show the 2 you already have
PSDTWO-1
Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) Core Requirements
PSDTWO-2
SCA Exemptions and Risk-Based Authentication

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ACSC Essential Eight to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition