7% of NIST SP 800-183 you already have
3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) already covers about 7% of NIST SP 800-183, leaving
28 of 30 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 2
New work 28
No control in 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)
maps directly to one in NIST SP 800-183. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) reaches these. This is the list to scope.
NoT.ELEM.COSTCost Element
NoT.ELEM.DEVDevice ID Element
NoT.ELEM.ENVEnvironment Element
NoT.ELEM.GEOGeographic Location Element
NoT.ELEM.OWNOwner Element
NoT.ELEM.SNAPSnapshot Element
NoT.PRIM.AGGRAggregator Primitive
NoT.PRIM.COMMCommunication Channel Primitive
NoT.PRIM.DTRIGDecision Trigger Primitive
NoT.PRIM.EUTILExternal Utility Primitive
NoT.PRIM.SENSORSensor Primitive
NoT.RISK.MISSIONMission Risk for NoT Deployments
NoT.SEC.AGGRAggregator Security
NoT.SEC.COMMCommunication Channel Security
NoT.SEC.DTRIGDecision Trigger Security
NoT.SEC.EUTILExternal Utility Security
NoT.SEC.SENSORSensor Security
NoT.TRUST.DATAData Trustworthiness
NoT.TRUST.IDENTPrimitive Identity Trust
NoT.TRUST.RELYReliability of Primitives
SP800-183-ENVIRONMENTOperating Environment and Latency
SP800-183-P1-SENSORPrimitive 1: Sensor
SP800-183-P2-AGGREGATORPrimitive 2: Aggregator
SP800-183-P2-CLUSTERAggregator Actor: Cluster
SP800-183-P2-WEIGHTAggregator Actor: Weight
SP800-183-P4-EUTILITYPrimitive 4: eUtility (external utility)
SP800-183-P5-TRIGGERPrimitive 5: Decision Trigger
SP800-183-RELIABILITYReliability and Trust Across Primitives
Show the 2 you already have
SP800-183-DATA-FLOWData Flow and Snapshots
SP800-183-P3-CHANNELPrimitive 3: Communication Channel
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition